DESPITE BEING THE BEST PREVENTATIVE MEASURE AGAINST HIV/AIDS, CIRCUMCISION IS DECLINING IN USA

CIRCUMCISION IS DECLINING RAPIDLY IN THE USA.

VIA GLENN: YAHOO:

Just a few generations ago, pretty much every baby boy in the U.S. was circumcised—aka, had the foreskin of his penis removed.

Now, new statistics presented at the International AIDS Conference in Vienna last month suggest a steep drop in the number of males getting this, uh, unkind cut. Last year, 33 percent of infant males were circumcised, a big drop compared to 2006, when 56 percent underwent this surgical procedure, according to stats reported in the New York Times.

ONLY 33%!?!?!? SHEESH!

WHY IS IT DECLINING?

I THINK DUE TO POSTMODERN LEFTISM:

• CIRCUMCISION IS REGARDED BY "PROGRESSIVES" AS JEWISH MUTILATION, MERELY AN ARCHAIC TRIBAL RITE WHICH DISFIGURES THE PENIS.
  

• (YES: POSTMODERNISTS LOOK AT ALL THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF OUR CIVILIZATION AS MERELY AN ARCHAIC AND VESTIGIAL COLLECTION OF TRIBAL SUPERSTITIONS NO DIFFERENT THAN THE CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS OF ANY OTHER AND ALL OTHER CULTURES.

• THIS IS CULTURAL RELATIVISM AND IT'S A CENTRAL TENET OF POSTMODERNISM.)
  

THE TRUTH IS THAT:

(1) CIRCUMCISION IS EXTREMELY BENEFICIAL MEDICALLY AND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH:

Male circumcision significantly reduces the spread of the HIV virus to men, according to research.

In terms of infectious disease, Aids is the biggest killer in Africa, with HIV frequent in the sexually-active populations of many countries.

But the study, carried out by European and African researchers, found that uncircumcised men were at least three times more likely than circumcised men to contract the virus.

MORE:

Circumcision may provide even more protection against AIDS than was realized when two clinical trials in Africa were stopped two months ago because the results were so clear, according to studies being published today.

The trials, in Kenya and Uganda, were stopped early by the National Institutes of Health, which was paying for them, because it was apparent that circumcision reduced a man’s risk of contracting AIDS from heterosexual sex by about half. It would have been unethical to continue without offering circumcision to all 8,000 men in the trials, federal health officials said.

That decision, announced on Dec. 13, made headlines around the world and led the two largest funds for fighting AIDS to say they would consider paying for circumcisions in high-risk countries. But the final data from the trials, to be published today in the British medical journal The Lancet, suggest that circumcision reduces a man’s risk by as much as 65 percent.

AND (2) FOR JEWS IT EXEMPLIFIES HOW WE MUST PARTICIPATE IN OUR OWN PERFECTION, AND IN THE PERFECTION OF THE WORLD.

• GOD COULD HAVE MADE US WITHOUT FORESKIN BUT CHOSE NOT TO IN ORDER THAT WE MIGHT TAKE RESPONSIBILITY AND REMOVE IT OURSELVES.
  

• JUST AS WE MUST CLEAN OURSELVES AND FEED OURSELVES AND CLOTHE OURSELVES AND CARE FOR OUR BABIES AND CARE FOR OUR AGED & INFIRM.

JEWS DON'T BELIEVE GENTILES HAVE TO BE CIRCUMCISED ANY MORE THAN THEY HAVE TO KEEP KOSHER.

BUT NOT ONLY DOES IT "NOT HURT", SCIENCE HAS PROVEN - BEYOND ANY DOUBT - THAT IT HELPS.

SCIENCE PROVES THAT GENTILES SHOULD EMULATE JEWS ON THIS MATTER.