Britain's The Independent newspaper - Corrupt or just plain sloppy?

An article in The Independent this morning, linked here, quotes the English Democrats' candidate in Oldham, Steve Morris, as follows:

Stephen Morris, who was out yesterday doing his best to interest people in voting for the fringe right-wing party the English Democrats, has also noticed Liberal Democrat activity, but claimed to have seen no Conservative canvassers, nor even a Tory leaflet. "We can see it on the ground here that the Conservatives are just making a token effort. They are not taking it seriously," he claimed.

{Note in Independent newspaperspeak "fringe" means anything not on a Progressive agenda (ie 'No Can Do' and 'Not our fault') while "right wing" is the opposite of reality, (where it stands for 'Common Sense' which incorporates 'individual responsibility' such as 'can do' and 'you may rely on us'}

The newspaper, to me quite incredibly but in truly typical anti-democratic fashion, then goes on to list the candidates excluding Mr Morris and any mention of the English Democrats!

Other media in England are guilty of the same tactics, the BBC casually referring viewers and listeners to its website where I was unable to find such a complete list last evening when wishing to post the same on this blog, when I had to rely on The Guardian, as may be seen from the posting beneath this.

BBC propaganda temporarily silenced - Broaden your mind

A report on the much to be welcomed short break from the poisoned output of the BBC's leading pro-EU, group-think clones is linked here.

Those with Sky Television receivers may wish to try the english language output of France 24 on Channel 513, we have already had one interesting item on the reverse brain drain from the US back to India this morning ahead of President Obama's three day visit to that country. The State visit of China's leader to France is another item on which BBC listeners would normally have remained ignorant.

Elsewhere on the internet there is a mass of varied and conflicting news sources. The now rather dated Australian morning newspapers are always worth a read as are those from Canada which normally appear around lunchtime.

The leading lights of the BBC deserve no pensions following their contribution to the destruction of our democracy, they should spend the next two days researching the reality of their EU enslaved employer's past activities and make a vow that in future they will first free their own minds to subsequently stick to only broadcasting facts while hosting others to pursue proper debates as may be found here or for those with Facebook here.

Hysterical Humphrys Over-yells Osborne

Yesterday's confirmation of this blog's assessment of the continuing horrible state of the British economy came when figures proved the recession continued through the third quarter. Discussing this on the BBC flagship Radio 4 political programme "Today" the smug, sarcastic and economics ignorant presenter John Humphrys repeatedly shouted down the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne. Readers may possibly hear this repeated on the web if they choose, the interview occurred at from eight-thirty to about a quarter to nine, it is not yet on the Listen Again facility.

Earlier this week we called for the immediate resignation of George Osborne for his lack of sensible alternative economic policies for the opposition during the past four years.

We now have added reason to call for this immature young man's departure. Any Shadow Chancellor of substance would have sternly reprimanded and thoroughly dressed down the hysterical BBC interviewer and demanded an apolgy on the spot.

It is clear that the BBC is intent upon the destruction of the wealth and morals of the nation so they can hardly be expected to remove the slimy John Humphrys from their bloated payroll, who with countless others spread their daily poison across the airwaves. The opposition must find figures who command such respect and grasp of their subjects that these awful interview techniques can be squashed at the moment they begin - that calls for hard men (or women selected on merit) not wimps.

England's revolting establishment appears to panic

The Radio Four, Today programme, used its brief minutes for spiritual reflection 'Thought for the Day' this morning for a five minute propaganda statement requiring the citizen's allegiance to the EU and Lisbon Treaty, in spite of it requiring foreign rule.

One of the few establishment figures previously prepared to openly criticize the handing of our nation to foreigners, together with the destruction of democracy thus entailed, Daniel Hannan, MEP (to his eternal shame) now writes that having the Lisbon Treaty and no referendum is henceforth OK. He further claims that all leading euro-sceptics accept this view. (To my knowledge, two such, Anne Palmer and Anthony Coughlan are in fact vigourously trying to drum up a legal challenge to the whole clearly illegal process). Read Hannan's shameful career-saving but spirit-destroying outburst from here. I quote just one of many outraged comments from the thread that follows:

In recent days Peer Steinbrück and Thilo Sarrazin have featured in Ambrose Evans-Prichard’s articles on this website: the first [the German Finance Minister] made a violent verbal attack on Britain and the second, [an official of the Bundesbank], an even more violent attack on Turkish immigrants in Berlin. One that made Enoch Powell look like a pussycat, although Sarrazin was gracious enough to say that he preferred Jews to the Turks.

I didn’t notice the Labour Party or the BBC responding to them because, after all, Europe and Europeans are perfect aren’t they? In fact, Germans foaming at the mouth are nothing to worry about. It’s inconceivable that just because they have a tradition of exploding every fifty years, or so, they will do it again because we’re all in the European Union now, aren’t we? And, heaven knows, it’s inconceivable that the Euro is turning out to be an instrument of German hegemony of which Hitler would have been proud. Perish the thought.

I live a lot of my time in the heart of Europe and people are somewhat similar everywhere, of course. Where they differ is in what one might call ’shared atavism’. It is obviously easy for people in the BBC and the Labour Party to pretend that this doesn’t exist. Maybe that is because our ‘ancestral pattern’ is to keep the hell away from Europe. About once per century, we ourselves go mad and get involved. The last person to make a reasonable fist of that was The Duke of Wellington [sorry, but I think WWI and WWII were a disaster for Britain]. He, however, is not a figure in European history books whereas Napoleon is still universally a hero.

When Europeans think of ‘the English’ they often have only a narrow economic view of what Britain stands for. Democracy, so hard-won and so longstanding in Britain, has astonishingly shallow roots in swathes of Europe. Authoritarian elites using vicious Kafkaesque bureaucracies to control the serfs are absolutely run-of-the-mill, however. The next time you are staying in Prague and are woken at 6am by someone trundling dustbins around behind your hotel, pop down and ask why they get up so infernally early; you’ll be told with some pride that the Emperor Ferdinand told the Czechs to be early risers [I'm not joking about this, although you'll need to brush up your Czech first].

The BBC and the Labour Party have been allowed to create a caricature of English nationalism. Enoch Powell, who was a professor of Greek at age 25 and rose from private to be the youngest brigadier in the British Army, was pilloried for saying what probably 80% of Englishmen believed, and believe, to be true. G.K. Chesterton said:

“Smile at us, pay us, pass us; but do not quite forget;
For we are the people of England, that never have spoken yet.”

Daniel, you are an amiable soul with clever ideas. Your article displays a commendable desire not to ruffle feathers. But I think that the people of England are about to speak. If Cameron will not give them their say about the EU, their voice will be heard as votes for UKIP at the next general election. And as a result of that Cameron & co will likely end up as mere footnotes in that thick volume entitled: ‘Failures of Nerve in British Political Life’

BBC blacks out the English Democrats

Showing a familiar pattern of subverting England' s democracy the English Democrats Party has forwarded a complaint to the BBC which you may choose to join by sending a similar message to the following:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/complaints_stage1.shtml

TEMPLATE FOR YOUR COMPLAINT

++++++++++++++++++
Dear BBC

Yesterday was the English Democrats Press Launch – we had the agreed amount of 20-30 Seconds coverage to use, secured by our 9 Deposits of £45,000.

You FAILED to cover the speech of Robin Tilbrook – National Party Chairman - which lasted for 20-30 Seconds.

Instead you did a voice over, telling the viewer that the English Democrats achieved 0.8% of the vote in England in 2004 You Failed to tell the view that actually the English Democrats only stood in 5 EU Regions in 2004 and actually achieve 1.4% where they stood, and achieved 130,000 votes, which given the TOTAL lack of coverage of the English Democrats by the BBC in 2004, was a surprising result (BNP and UKIP got half this the first time they stood)

YOU also failed to mention that in 2004 the BBC Failed to give the English Democrats ANY TV or Radio Coverage due to a mistake by the BBC.

Additionally, despite the fact that it had been pre-agreed that YOU the BBC only wanted a 20-30 Second Video of Robin Tilbrook, you decided to use Footage to imply that the Hall was poorly attended, when in fact a handful of helpers had attended simply to put up the Exhibition Stand.

If you wanted to see a Hall full of English Democrats then you should have responded to your invite to attend the English Democrats Spring Conference in Portsmouth in April 2009.

Please explain why the BBC, has deliberately portrayed the English Democrats in such a poor light, and what YOU intend to rectify your mistake

(YOU pulled the same stunt in 2005, and in 2008 misinformed the public that the English Democrats Mayoral Candidate had withdrawn when in fact it was not possible for him to withdraw unless he was dead - this was not the case)

Please explain why you are deliberately trying to sabotage the English Democrats Campaign, and what you will do to rectify this sabotage.

++++++++++

The BBC - Big Brother's Cohorts

The main headline this morning for a truly independent media, as it was for this blog, would be the UKIP surge announced in a YouGov poll. News that voters have propelled this small party to be level with the Governing Labour Party predicting a real poll due to be held in mere days on 4th June, is surely news indeed, yet so cowed by the lead of the monopolistic BBC are Britain's media that the entire press, except The Spectator, have kept silent on this fact.

The media has aided the destruction of democracy in Britain and it has been led by the self-serving, compliant and greedy employees of the BBC, fit for the label Big Brother's Cohorts which I have today given them in this blog's heading.

I must remind my readers that it was the BBC chairing a meeting of all Britain's broadcasting media that ensured Veritas (a party formed to make the public aware of the deliberate corruption and destruction of Britain's Parliament and democracy) would never be heard on any airwaves in the last General Election campaign, when they informed me that even were the new party to field a candidate in every single constituency in the land - WE WOULD NOT BE GRANTED ONE SINGLE PARTY POLITICAL BROADCAST!

BY what right did they assume such power - used solely it would appear for the self-enrichment of their own self-selected elite!

Watch the video I posted earlier in the week with one of so many of their useless and totally mind-controlled talking head non-entities, this time on BBC News 24, admitting to earning ninety-two thousand pounds a year. Consider what amounts the New Labour parasite, James Naughtie and his colleagues must have pocketed down the years from the licence fee payers they have even left cowering in their own homes from their grotesque database threats, while broadcasting garbage such as this from Today programme on Radio 4, this morning. Does not their self-righteousness make you feel a similar stirring of rage to that when reading your morning Daily Telegraph?

Read my posts from April 2008 when they deliberately wrecked the point of the second choice vote in the London Mayoral elections. Particularly the lame excuse of Sean Moss, linked here.

Steve Richards writing in The Independent, here, is correct that we are now at a turning point, but if we are to restore values to our society, our currency, our Parliament and our democracy we must regain our independence and we must not believe that the rot stops at Westminster, the BBC is as complicit as any senior Government Minister, a start can be made in their cleansing as suggested on this blog posting last month, here.

The Ninety-two thousand BBC non-entity salary broadcast!

BBC World Talking Headdess earns Ninety-two thousand pounds a year!

n an argument on air this morning with an ex-Labour MP and supporter of Master Maggot Speaker Martin, a virtually unknown TV presenter admitted taking home a massive ninety-two thousand pounds a year, entirely funded by the distasteful extortion campaigns of the BBC itself, in the disgraceful tax known as the licence fee.

Amazingly she then went on to justify this grotesque qaste of licence-fee payers by stating that she paid for all her own phone calls made from the BBC facilities!

I will post the video here when and if I can trace it - it was a good interview so she earned her money for today at least.

McBride's Media Assets must be exposed and removed.

Alice Miles writing in The Times this morning, linked here, takes up this blog's theme of the culpability of the media in the now widely acknowledged fatal poisoning of Britain's political processes, read here and here. I quote from her article in the The Times, but add my own emphasis:

The keys to the system are held by journalists. It is only through the collusion of journalists that underhand and anonymous attacks on political colleagues can have any effect.

The media are all chorusing now: we knew, we called him McNasty and McPoison, we had nothing to do with him, he sent us foul messages, we didn’t like him. But the point is, we did know. We may not have known the detail of the nasty smears about senior Conservatives that Mr McBride was dreaming up, but we knew about the smears against his own side. We knew what he was up to, and we knew that he was being paid more than £100,000 a year of public money to do it – and we did nothing to stop it.

Many are guilty but the main culprits are undoubtedly at the heart of the organisation that is now the State Controlled Broadcaster, still calling itself the BBC but bearing no resemlance to that once august institution, which has led the way and set the tone.

I repeat the four that should, in my view, be the first to go (also without severance pay and only the basic state pension for the years served) as appearing with the title from my earlier posting:

The BBC must now sack the Purveyors of the Poison

BBC Bias in Guido Fawkes Downing Street E-Mail Affair

On the BBC Today programme this morning at about 0841 Political Correspondent Ross Hawkins made the following comments regarding a smear campaign run from Downing Street by a close associate of the Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

"... but absolutely it is the detail of these e-mails that will matter and because they will come out in drips and drips the story has the potential to carry on going over a number of days and it is simply by that longevity if nothing else to be damaging"

Link to the broadcast is here. Link to Guido Fawkes Blog for background and developments here. Background gossip from here.

How can a BBC Political Correspondent, with the slightest concern for the good of his country, believe that bringing to the light of day the disgraceful activities of a man so close to the Prime Minister be anything other than for the good of the nation and the benefit of all its people who stand to be better informed of the nature of the people who run this government and therefore be rid of it all the sooner and thereby possibly save many more billions of debt!